Employment Law Videography

Employment law litigation is deeply personal and often credibility-driven. LexHD provides videography that:

• Captures tone, expression, and emotion in discrimination, retaliation, or harassment claims
• Preserves critical testimony from HR reps, supervisors, and claimants
• Enhances jury perception by showing how witnesses deliver their words — not just what they say
  Visual evidence in employment law is particularly effective when dealing with he-said-she-said narratives, workplace dynamics, and intent-based claims.

LexHD records:

• Depositions of plaintiffs, managers, HR personnel, and co-workers
• Expert witness depositions (psychological, economic, HR standards)
• EUOs or internal corporate investigations
• Independent Medical Exams (IMEs) for emotional distress or PTSD claims
• Day-in-the-life videos for wrongful termination or ADA/reasonable accommodation matters
• Trial or arbitration testimony when permissible
  These recordings serve as evidence, negotiation tools, and persuasive aids at every stage of litigation.

Yes. Employment litigation often includes emotionally charged or reputationally sensitive testimony. LexHD videographers are trained to:

• Maintain neutrality, professionalism, and discretion
• Operate with non-intrusive, courtroom-compliant protocols
• Respect all parties while ensuring a complete, uninterrupted visual record
  Our presence is felt only in the strength of the final deliverable — not in the room.

Video enables attorneys to:

• Highlight inconsistencies between deposition and live testimony
• Present emotional testimony that resonates with juries
• Contrast the demeanor of accused individuals versus claimants
• Showcase body language, nonverbal cues, and overall credibility
  LexHD turns complex workplace disputes into clear, visual narratives that help judges and jurors understand the human impact of unlawful employment practices.

Yes — and LexHD specializes in both. We offer:

• Fully remote videography with platform-hosting, multi-feed recording, and secure delivery
• Hybrid setups for in-person and remote participants, ensuring all parties are captured in HD
• Integrated screen-sharing for personnel file exhibits, email chains, and training documentation
  Whether it’s a plaintiff testifying from home or an HR manager joining remotely, we maintain legal-grade capture, clarity, and chain of custody.

Yes. LexHD ensures every recording complies with:

• Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 30(b)(3) & Rule 32
• Local state civil rules for admissibility
• Formatting and delivery standards for trial, arbitration, or agency proceedings (EEOC, DFEH, etc.)
  Our videos are admissible for impeachment, evidence-in-chief, or designation playback, depending on jurisdiction.

Absolutely. Synced videos allow you to:

• Search by keyword, page, or line
• Create impeachment clips for live cross-examination
• Export trial-ready video for playback in TrialDirector, OnCue, or Sanction
  This is especially valuable in employment law where inconsistencies, subtle phrasing, and tone can shift the narrative.

LexHD video services help shape perceptions before trial by:

• Demonstrating plaintiff credibility and emotional impact
• Revealing inconsistencies in management or HR testimony
• Presenting concise impeachment clips in settlement conferences
  A five-minute video clip can speak louder than a 500-page case file — and LexHD ensures it’s crafted for maximum persuasion.

We use:

• HD/4K cameras, discreetly positioned
• Lavalier and ambient audio, ensuring all speakers are clearly recorded
• On-screen timestamps, file labeling, and trial-compatible formats
  All video is delivered in MP4 or MPEG-2, ready for use in litigation platforms or standalone playback, and protected by full chain-of-custody documentation.

LexHD understands:

• The nuances of employment litigation
• The emotional weight of testimony in harassment, retaliation, ADA, and wage disputes
• The need for evidentiary precision and absolute neutrality
  From discovery to verdict, we help attorneys present their cases not just with evidence — but with strategic visual power.